德祥科技有限公司
中級(jí)會(huì)員 | 第10年

13311628621

當(dāng)前位置:首頁(yè)   >>   資料下載   >>   凍干機(jī)設(shè)備性能的測(cè)量:兩種方法的比較

凍干機(jī)設(shè)備性能的測(cè)量:兩種方法的比較

時(shí)間:2022-9-26閱讀:484
分享:
  • 提供商

    德祥科技有限公司
  • 資料大小

    956KB
  • 資料圖片

    查看
  • 下載次數(shù)

    0次
  • 資料類型

    PDF 文件
  • 瀏覽次數(shù)

    484次
點(diǎn)擊免費(fèi)下載該資料

The objective of this investigation was to evaluate two methods for measuring the maximum sublimation rate that a freeze-dryer will support—the minimum controllable pressure method and the choke point method. Both methods gave equivalent results, but the minimum controllable pressure method is preferred, since it is easier, faster, and less subjective. The ratio of chamber pressure to condenser pressure corresponding to the onset of chokedflflow was considerably higher in this investigation (up to about 20:1) than in previously published reports. This ratio was not affected by the location of the pressure gauge on the condenser; that is, on the foreline of the vacuum pumpversuson the body of the condenser itself. The total water loss due to sublimation as measured by tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy was consistently within 5% of gravimetrically determined weight loss, regardless of whether the measurement took place during chokedversusnon-choked process conditions.


會(huì)員登錄

×

請(qǐng)輸入賬號(hào)

請(qǐng)輸入密碼

=

請(qǐng)輸驗(yàn)證碼

收藏該商鋪

X
該信息已收藏!
標(biāo)簽:
保存成功

(空格分隔,最多3個(gè),單個(gè)標(biāo)簽最多10個(gè)字符)

常用:

提示

X
您的留言已提交成功!我們將在第一時(shí)間回復(fù)您~
撥打電話
在線留言